The chicks have been good to me!Lawrence Fan wrote:Dude, don't listen to that baby making machine that is Fenrisinho. He's just in it for the chicks.Dr. Zapatos wrote:This explains a lot.Fenrisinho wrote:3.5.1 Real User Priority (RUP)Talus wrote:I give, RUP factor?
The real user priority of a user measures the resource usage of the user through time. Every user begins with a RUP of half (i.e., 0.5) and, at steady state, the RUP of a user equilibrates to the number of resources used by that user. Therefore, if a particular user continuously uses exactly ten resources for a long period of time, the RUP of that user stabilizes at ten.
However, if the user decreases the number of resources used, the RUP value of user drops (i.e., gets better). The rate at which the priority value decays can be set by the macro PRIORITY_HALFLIFE, which is a time period defined in seconds. Intuitively, if the PRIORITY_HALFLIFE in a pool is set to 86400 (i.e., one day) and if a user whose RUP was 10 removes all his jobs, the user's RUP would be 5 one day later, 2.5 two days hence, etc.
Footy Talk
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:04 pm
- Location: T for
-
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 7:36 pm
- Location: The corner of Awesome and What The Hell?!?!
Dude, don't listen to that baby making machine that is Fenrisinho. He's just in it for the chicks.Dr. Zapatos wrote:This explains a lot.Fenrisinho wrote:3.5.1 Real User Priority (RUP)Talus wrote:I give, RUP factor?
The real user priority of a user measures the resource usage of the user through time. Every user begins with a RUP of half (i.e., 0.5) and, at steady state, the RUP of a user equilibrates to the number of resources used by that user. Therefore, if a particular user continuously uses exactly ten resources for a long period of time, the RUP of that user stabilizes at ten.
However, if the user decreases the number of resources used, the RUP value of user drops (i.e., gets better). The rate at which the priority value decays can be set by the macro PRIORITY_HALFLIFE, which is a time period defined in seconds. Intuitively, if the PRIORITY_HALFLIFE in a pool is set to 86400 (i.e., one day) and if a user whose RUP was 10 removes all his jobs, the user's RUP would be 5 one day later, 2.5 two days hence, etc.
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:04 pm
- Location: T for
This explains a lot.Fenrisinho wrote:3.5.1 Real User Priority (RUP)Talus wrote:I give, RUP factor?
The real user priority of a user measures the resource usage of the user through time. Every user begins with a RUP of half (i.e., 0.5) and, at steady state, the RUP of a user equilibrates to the number of resources used by that user. Therefore, if a particular user continuously uses exactly ten resources for a long period of time, the RUP of that user stabilizes at ten.
However, if the user decreases the number of resources used, the RUP value of user drops (i.e., gets better). The rate at which the priority value decays can be set by the macro PRIORITY_HALFLIFE, which is a time period defined in seconds. Intuitively, if the PRIORITY_HALFLIFE in a pool is set to 86400 (i.e., one day) and if a user whose RUP was 10 removes all his jobs, the user's RUP would be 5 one day later, 2.5 two days hence, etc.
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:04 pm
- Location: T for
-
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 7:36 pm
- Location: The corner of Awesome and What The Hell?!?!
-
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 7:36 pm
- Location: The corner of Awesome and What The Hell?!?!
Corrected.Dr. Zapatos wrote:What we is and what we isn't AIN'T none of your business!calexico wrote:What misspelling? Thou was correct, not though. Never mind the Doctor, his first language isn't even English.Lawrence Fan wrote:You know, Ben would have been all over my misspelling.Dr. Zapatos wrote:Hoho!Lawrence Fan wrote:Dr. Shoes, wherefore art though, Liverpool?
EDIT: Alternatively, I am missing some undercurrent between you two and you really ARE that stupid.
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:04 pm
- Location: T for
What we is and what we isn't are none of your business!calexico wrote:What misspelling? Thou was correct, not though. Never mind the Doctor, his first language isn't even English.Lawrence Fan wrote:You know, Ben would have been all over my misspelling.Dr. Zapatos wrote:Hoho!Lawrence Fan wrote:Dr. Shoes, wherefore art though, Liverpool?
EDIT: Alternatively, I am missing some undercurrent between you two and you really ARE that stupid.
What misspelling? Thou was correct, not though. Never mind the Doctor, his first language isn't even English.Lawrence Fan wrote:You know, Ben would have been all over my misspelling.Dr. Zapatos wrote:Hoho!Lawrence Fan wrote:Dr. Shoes, wherefore art though, Liverpool?
EDIT: Alternatively, I am missing some undercurrent between you two and you really ARE that stupid.
-
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 7:36 pm
- Location: The corner of Awesome and What The Hell?!?!
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:04 pm
- Location: T for
-
- Posts: 6677
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 7:36 pm
- Location: The corner of Awesome and What The Hell?!?!
Dr. Shoes, wherefore art thou, Liverpool?
Last edited by Lawrence Fan on Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:10 am, edited 1 time in total.